My 2026 AI Stack: 20 AI Tools for Calm, Human-Led Digital Operations
Everyone talks about AI. Fewer people can explain what they actually use, day to day, in real work. For freelancers and small teams, an AI stack should feel calm, not chaotic.
It supports how I run digital operations. Calm systems. Clear thinking. Human accountability. These are tools that have earned their place in my workflow. I am specific on purpose. Tool choice matters.
How an Integrated AI Stack Reduces Cognitive Overload
How I Choose Tools
I do not look for all-in-one solutions. I look for tools that do one thing well and stay in their lane.
Each tool in this stack supports one of three areas:
Thinking and reasoning
Making and shaping work
Running operations reliably
I also have one hard rule. I do not input identifiable client or participant data into AI tools. When AI supports work involving sensitive information, I use anonymised structures, placeholders, or aggregated data, then apply the method securely.
Claude
Claude is my primary thinking partner.
I use it for complex reasoning, code troubleshooting, system logic, documentation structuring, and working through problems with multiple dependencies. I rely on it heavily for HTML and CSS analysis, especially when something breaks quietly and needs careful diagnosis.
Claude is strong at holding context. It explains why something works or fails, not just what to change. That matters when decisions have knock-on effects.
I use it to think, not to publish. Everything gets reviewed, tested, and rewritten.
ChatGPT
ChatGPT is my fast-response tool.
I use it for quick questions, idea generation, and producing multiple variations when I need options to react to. It is useful when speed matters more than depth.
I switch between Claude and ChatGPT deliberately. ChatGPT for pace. Claude for precision.
Perplexity
Perplexity supports research that needs current sources.
I use it for market checks, technical comparisons, and validating assumptions before going deeper. The citations matter. They let me trace information back to primary sources quickly.
It replaces broad Googling and shortens the orientation phase of research.
Comet (Perplexity Browser)
Comet brings AI into the browser itself.
I use it when researching across many tabs or troubleshooting live systems. Having context-aware assistance inside the browser reduces friction and keeps focus intact.
I am selective about when I use it, but for research-heavy sessions it earns its place.
NotebookLM
NotebookLM is a synthesis tool.
I use it when working with multiple documents, briefings, reports, or reference materials. It helps surface connections and maintain a coherent view across large inputs.
The audio overview feature is useful for orientation when stepping away from the screen.
ClickUp
ClickUp runs my projects.
Its AI features help with task structuring, project templates, and drafting clear task descriptions. I use the AI to reduce setup time, not to manage accountability.
The system stays explicit and visible.
Airtable AI (Omni)
Omni supports pattern recognition inside Airtable.
I use it for qualitative analysis, theme spotting, and sense-checking complex datasets. It is useful for surfacing signals, not for final numbers.
Any calculations or statistics are verified separately.
Make
Make handles complex automations.
I use it for multi-step workflows with conditions and branching logic, including finance and reporting processes. Once built, these systems run quietly in the background.
Zapier
Zapier handles simple automations.
When I need something fast and reliable with minimal logic, Zapier is the right tool. I use it more often, but for lighter work.
Otter.ai
Otter captures spoken thinking.
I use it for meeting notes and lighter transcription where speed and accessibility matter. It is especially useful for capturing live discussions and turning them into usable notes.
This supports one of my core practices. Capture work as it happens. Structure it later.
Sonix
Sonix is my precision transcription tool.
I use it for complex audio where accuracy matters. Interviews, detailed discussions, layered speech, or content that will be reused or published. Sonix consistently outperforms other tools when nuance, terminology, or clarity are important.
Otter and Sonix serve different purposes. One is for flow. One is for accuracy.
Canva
Canva is critical to how I work.
I use it to turn ideas, data, and content into clear, usable visuals. Slides, worksheets, flyers, social assets, PDFs, and internal documentation all live here.
Canva is not a design shortcut for me. It is a production environment that allows fast iteration without sacrificing clarity or consistency.
Leonardo AI
Leonardo is my visual creation stack.
I use it to generate images and short video sequences when stock visuals fall short. This includes social content, blog imagery, presentation assets, and concept visuals.
Within Leonardo, I regularly use: • Nano Banana Pro for higher-quality image outputs • Kling for short-form motion and animated sequences
I generate selectively, review critically, and curate carefully. The goal is useful visuals, not volume.
Filmora
Filmora is my primary video editing tool.
I use it to assemble, refine, and finish video content once the raw material exists. It gives me precise control over pacing, layout, and structure, with light AI assistance where it genuinely helps.
This is where work gets finished properly.
CapCut
CapCut supports fast, short-form editing.
I use it for reels and social clips where speed, captions, and format matter more than polish. It allows quick iteration without losing control of the final output.
Suno
Suno supports original audio creation. I use it to generate custom background music and sound elements for short-form video and presentations. It allows me to match tone and pacing without relying on generic stock libraries.
Only outputs that meet a professional standard get used.
ElevenLabs
ElevenLabs is my voice tool.
I use it for narration and voiceover when creating video content. The quality is natural enough to use sparingly without distraction.
I am careful about consistency and consent when experimenting with voice features.
MailerLite
MailerLite runs my email communication and automation.
I use it for newsletters, forms, onboarding sequences, and operational automations. Tagging, conditional logic, and structured flows allow communication to run reliably without constant manual intervention.
This is where messaging, timing, and systems meet.
SaneBox
SaneBox manages inbox noise.
It learns what matters and what can wait, allowing me to focus on priority messages without constant triage. This supports sustained attention, which is an operational asset.
Agenda Hero
Agenda Hero is a small, focused utility.
I use it to turn unstructured emails and event details into clean calendar entries, particularly when juggling bilingual schedules and school systems. It earns its place by doing one thing well.
How the Stack Works Together
No single tool does everything. Each supports a specific task. Together, they reduce friction and cognitive overload while keeping judgement and responsibility exactly where they belong.
This is my AI stack. Calm. Selective. Human-led.
The Complete AI Tool Stack Organised by Function
FAQs
-
My approach is deliberate, not experimental. These tools have earned their place by solving actual problems, not potential ones.
Human judgement stays central
AI reduces friction and cognitive overload. It doesn't replace decision-making. I use AI to think, not to publish. Everything gets reviewed, tested, and rewritten. Task structuring can be automated, but accountability stays explicit and visible with me.
Specialisation over consolidation
I don't look for all-in-one solutions. I look for tools that do one thing well and stay in their lane. Each tool supports one of three areas: thinking and reasoning, making and shaping work, or running operations reliably.
This means deliberately switching tools based on context:
ChatGPT for speed, Claude for precision
Otter for flow, Sonix for accuracy
Make for complex logic, Zapier for simple automations
Strict data boundaries
I never input identifiable client or participant data into AI tools. When AI supports work involving sensitive information, I use anonymised structures, placeholders, or aggregated data, then apply the method securely. This isn't negotiable.
Critical verification
AI outputs are signals, not facts. I use Omni for pattern recognition but verify calculations separately. I generate visuals selectively and review critically. Only outputs that meet professional standards get used.
Capture work, structure later
I distinguish between gathering information and processing it. Fast tools capture work as it happens. Synthesis tools structure it later when coherence matters. This prevents the friction of trying to organise while you're still learning.
The underlying principle is simple: tools should support sustained attention and clear thinking, not create dependency or cognitive debt.
-
For complex troubleshooting, I almost always use Claude.
Claude is my primary thinking partner when I'm working through problems that have multiple dependencies. When I change one element and it might affect three other things downstream, I need an AI that holds context well and explains why something works or fails, not just what to change.
This matters especially when troubleshooting HTML and CSS, where something can break quietly and you need careful diagnosis to find the actual cause rather than just patching symptoms.
ChatGPT gets used during troubleshooting only when I have quick, standalone questions that don't require deep context, or when I need to generate multiple variations of a solution quickly so I have options to test.
The pattern is simple: ChatGPT for pace, Claude for precision.
In practice, this means complex troubleshooting defaults to Claude because the problems worth troubleshooting are rarely simple or isolated. If it were straightforward, I wouldn't need AI help in the first place.
-
Claude doesn't have magic debugging powers. What it does have is the ability to hold context and explain logic, which matters when something breaks without throwing an obvious error.
When I'm troubleshooting HTML and CSS issues that fail silently (a layout collapses on mobile, a widget displays incorrectly under certain conditions, styles mysteriously stop working) Claude helps by explaining why something works or fails, not just handing me a patch.
This matters because quiet breaks usually mean something's interacting badly with something else. Inheritance conflicts, specificity issues, responsive breakpoints behaving weirdly because three other rules are also fighting over the same element.
Claude can track these dependencies across a longer troubleshooting session. I show it the HTML structure, the CSS, describe what's happening, and it holds that context as we work through the diagnosis.
-
NotebookLM excels when I'm working across multiple documents that need to talk to each other.
If I'm starting a large client project and I have briefing documents, past reports, research materials, and reference files, NotebookLM helps me see the connections I'd otherwise miss. It surfaces patterns across inputs and maintains a coherent view when I'm dealing with information that's genuinely complex, not just long.
This is different from asking Claude or ChatGPT to summarize a single document. NotebookLM is designed for synthesis across sources. It's particularly good at showing me where Document A contradicts Document B, or where three separate sources are all pointing at the same underlying issue without stating it explicitly.
The audio overview feature is useful for orientation. When I'm stepping into a complex project, I can listen to a synthesis while away from my desk and get oriented on the landscape before diving into the detail work.
The limitation is that NotebookLM is strictly a synthesis tool. It doesn't replace Claude for reasoning through what to do with the information, or ChatGPT for generating options. It just helps me understand what I'm actually working with when the inputs are scattered and substantial.
-
The following methods can be used to apply AI capabilities securely:
• Anonymised Structures: Work is adapted into structural frameworks where identifying details have been removed prior to AI processing.
• Placeholders: Specific sensitive information is replaced with generic variables or placeholders, allowing the AI to work on the logic or format without accessing the actual data.
• Aggregated Data: Information is combined into summaries or aggregates, ensuring that individual data points remain private while still allowing for high-level analysis.
These strategies ensure that while AI can support the methodology or structure of the work, the sensitive information itself remains secure and outside the AI system.
